Effects on the upright seated posture.

  • ‘Correct’  upright sitting posture requires considerable effort at  odds with the body energy saving demands. 
  • So,   not only is it almost impossible to maintain but also incorporates factors that have and produce negative bio-medical effects with the potential to result in musculo-skeletal breakdown of skeletal components. 
    • These consist of the intervertebral discs and the ligament and muscular structures that lie posteriorly and occurs mainly at the lumbo-sacral junction and cervical joints.   
  • It counters  how the spine has adapted  to accomadate these effects that occurred with hominid bipedalism, orthograde posture and enlarged cranialisation shown by paleo-anthropology.   Lumbar vulnerability and Paleoanthropology →.
  • On adopting an upright seated posture there are a number of changes from  the balanced standing  position that can affect the vulnerable lumbo-sacral junction.      
  • The adverse effects on the upright sitting posture.  

Sitting effects

1. Backward pelvic tilt leading to loss of lumbar lordosis and reduction of the protective wedge angle.

  • When sitting there is backward tilting (anat; forward rotation) of the pelvis, which reduces or reverses the protective wedge angle of the lower lumbar joints The  backward pelvic  tilt  with the loss of low lumbar lordosis reduces or even reverses the protective wedge angle of the lower lumbar joint.
  • hips 90 & L suptThese effects are augmented by:   →
    • Misplaced lumbar support .
    • (support should be ‘pelvic’. directed to the iliac crest. (Gorman J.))  ☛(See Lumbar & spinal support→).
    •  Hips at 90° due to seat being parallel to floor.
    • With the pull of the hamstring a gluteal muscles/
    • (Ideally hip at 110-135°which is achieved by a FTS or in a reclined mode)
    • Axial loading.   .  With  the currently advocated upright sitting posture there is an increase of spinal loading 500% above that of lying supine which is relevant to the 2T reclined mode.    Determined by  Wilke (Wilke1999) as 0.10 MPa for standing and  sitting  0.55 MPa.  See ☛Loading
    • Axial compression + flexion.      As shown above the axial loading force comes to lie posterior to the pivot point at the Ischial Tuberosities. A backward turning movement results in backward tilt of the pelvis with flexion of the vulnerable lower joints .    This all results in the main factors in retro-pulsion of the IV disc contents.

Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 16.09.08
 2. Lack of variation in posture and loading.

See ☛Importance of movement→

3. Stretching of the posterior elements

Including ligaments which can become permanent and allow instability.Ligaments

Ligaments & CTD→

Effect of flexion on the IV disc

In the flexed position, the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosis undergoes compression while the posterior portion is under tensile stress. This augments the intra-discal pressure largely due to tension of the posterior ligaments.   In full flexion this can be as much as 100%.   The pressure gradient,  increased anteriorly,   tends to retropulsion of the nucleus pulposus (NP).

Screen Shot 2016-06-02 at 12.15.18

Mandal 1

 

 The pMRI evidence

The above effect has been shown incontrovertibly to occur by pMRI scans (Smith FE 2006).  From  which the following pictures are derived (arrows, etc, are added).

Screen Shot 2014-04-07 at 12.44.10 Screen Shot 2014-04-07 at 12.49.19

 

pMRI scan in reclined, relaxed, sitting mode shows the NP in a safe mid-position.

The hip angle is at 135°.

 

 

 

pMRI scan in an upright sitting mode shows the NP has translated posteriorly which can culminate in protrusion.

Hips are at an angle of 90° with the seat-pan horizontal.

 This confirms the bio-mechanical evidence.

The axial compression, whether raised or not, which occurs while sitting in the upright position and usually compounded by a near extreme range of spinal flexion, is postulated as a likely to be an important cause of compromise of a degenerate disc.

Clinical effects

   If the annulus is unable to contain the increased hydrostatic pressure of the nucleus, while being stressed vertically and simultaneously stretched posteriorly by forward pelvic tilting, retropulsion of the nucleus pulposus becomes more likely.   Anterior bulging also occurs and in time becomes contained by osteophytic (‘Parrot’s beaks’ in French) outgrowths from the adjoining vertebral margins.   These are evident on x-rays and are silent clinically.  This is in contradistinction to disc bulging with a backward or a postero-lateral protrusion where impingement is likely on a number of pain sensitive structures.   Herniation or rupture of the annulus can then occur  with posterior nuclear or, more commonly, a postero-lateral protrusion which can threaten the emerging nerve root.  A large midline extrusion can rupture the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resulting in the surgical emergency of a Corda Equina syndrome.

Office workers seated positions

The Cambridge  2T project study.   In an ad hoc observation of sitting positions in a nearby  office, students came up with the following results in relation to the postures shown above.  In the absence of reclined chairs 52% + 30% avoided the upright posture.

Screen Shot 2013-09-24 at 19.25.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hermann Miller also show research on body/chair interface pressures in the upright positions. Pressure maps are shown but none of a semi-reclined mode are shown as in the Okamura research.

Effect of sitting for prolonged periods.

Sitting for prolonged periods  is obvious to most patients and clinicians who treat them  as an association with LBP with and results in a high reporting of LBP by sedentary workers and was recognised in the early work as a risk factor (Bendix 1994).

Sitting in the ordinary way is not associated with spinal pathology unless prolonged for about half a workday (Lis AM, 2007) and a higher  prevalence rate has also been reported in those occupations that require the worker to sit for the majority of a working day and is significantly higher than the prevalence rate of the general population (Papageorgiou 1975) particularly among those aged 35 years and older who have had sedentary jobs for several years (Kelsey JL. 1971) and if combined with  awkward postures or Whole Body Vibration (Lings S, 2000)  which occurs with driving a car (Kelsey 1975), tractor or, worst, a helicopter.  This association was refuted in a later study with 45 pairs of identical twins (Battie et al., 2002).

It is not a general view but long-term, low-level chronic stressors that occur with prolonged sitting (Wood and McLeich, 1974.)  may be as important as acute impact forces such as falls and lifting strains of heavy manual work.   Sitting for more than 6 hours daily increases mortality by 37% for females and 17% for men. The gender difference is unexplained (Patel.2013).

There is a strong presumption that prolonged sitting in adverse ergonomic circumstances, especially in childhood, is fundamental to the explosive rise in the prevalence and incidence of spinal pathology and LBP.  

For partial remediation, with an upright chair, see: Forward Tilted Seat and Pelvic support

  For full  remediation see: 2T CONCEPT a full solution

 

Next ☛  Biomechanics research